Maritain And My Bad Mood

Maybe it is the terrible mood I am right now, but it was very hard to read Jacques Maritain today. If I want to present a paper in the upcoming conference I need to find something to write about him. But, now that I just finished reading “Christian Humanism”, my impression is that I just listened to Catholic sermon.

I guess the weakness within me makes me fascinated about the idea of God. I wish I could believe it. I really do. But, perhaps my fascination is about man and his madness, instead. Because when I listen to Christians talking — even Christian philosophers — they sound like madman. Maritain text reads like madness.

I simply can’t carry on. Especially not today. Not during these hard times. I am not weak enough to get more susceptible to faith; quite the contrary. During difficult times, I feel the increasing need to reassess my life, to review my premises, to research the facts I take for granted. At times like these, people talking about angels irritate me.

I was happy to find in Maritain’s tomistic metaphysics echoes of Objectivism. But they were just echoes. Maybe there is still a lot to learn with him, but now that I went beyond his metaphysics to his humanism, I need some detox.

Maritain criticizes Marxism in harsh ways (which I agree), talking about man submitting himself to a collective conscience, the well-know objectivist concept of the “primacy of consciousness” in the “social” variety. But he does so while also criticizing the “false” conviction that came with Modernity that man alone could work out his salvation:

“…this salvation demands the giving up of personality, and the organization of collective man into one single body whose supreme destiny is to gain dominion over matter and human history.”

“He is a particle of the social whole and lives on the collective consciousness of the whole, and his happiness and liberty lie in serving the work of the whole. This whole itself is an economic and industrial whole, its essential and primordial work consists of the industrial domination of nature, for the sake of the very whole which alone presents absolute value, and has nothing above itself.”

Pure social primacy of consciousness. But then he talks about how this sacrificing to “industry’s titanism” led to animality, despair, the rejection of reason and the spirit, and then racism and nazism.

I won’t comment on his political snippets in the text, because he then goes on to expound a solution that is completely devoid of value for me: a new Christian civilization, a new Christendom. I wonder if that will include witch-hunt and burning crosses again.

It might be my bad mood, like I said, but all he says after his analysis of Marxism sounds like gibberish to me. Sorry.

It’s strange. As I read more about Christianity, and, in a way, seem more interested in it, my rejection to it increases. Slowly, I realize this universal blindness in men, this unthinking acceptance of religious beliefs, i.e., unfounded mystical concoctions.

“Man’s dignity is that of an image of God, his rights derive as well as his duties from natural law, whose requirements express in the creature the eternal plan of creative Wisdom. Wounded by sin and death from the first sin of his race, whose burden weighs upon all of us, he is caused by Christ to become of the race and lineage of God, living by divine life, and called upon to enter by suffering and love into Christ’s very work of redemption.”

Is this a priest or a philosopher speaking? Again, that means nothing to me, or, worse than that, it means sheer irrationality.

Maritain hates man’s sacrificing to the collective consciousness, but then he says this:

“The meaning of that paradox is that man knows very well that death is not an end, but a beginning. If I think of the perishable life of man, it is something naturally sacred, yet many things are still more precious: Man can be required to sacrifice it by devotion to his neighbor or by his duty to his country.

Many things more precious than my life? No.

I know “very well” that my death is a beginning? No.

I can be “required” to sacrifice my life? No.

By devotion to my neighbor? No.

By duty to my country? NO!

And then he complains about communism and nazism.

The more I read about other philosophies and other philosophers, the more I agree with Objectivism and Ayn Rand.

But, again, maybe that’s just my bad mood today.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Maritain And My Bad Mood

    • Hey,
      I guess that would be tantamount to criticizing Christianism. Apart from the fact that it is a Catholic University organizing the event, I think that would only show my philosophical ineptitude.
      I need to go deeper into Maritain, but right now I lack the time and, like I said and (unfortunately) really meant it, the mood…
      Thanks for coming back!

      Like

      • Did you say you live in Brazil?

        I attend a Jesuit University but it is definitely caters to open discussion about things. Very few people that I’ve encountered are Christian but there are some Christians, and I think very few of the faculty are Christian also.

        But there is a woman a classmate who is from Brazil, and there is another woman who I’ve met who is from El Salvador. And they are up here to get their degree.

        But I was talking with one of them the other day and then I didn’t want to make an overgeneralization in what we are talking about to say that everyone is Roman Catholic. But then she said, well they are! Lol

        So, I can understand how it might be difficult to think freely if everyone around you has opinions based in a certain assumption of having respect for Catholicism. If you’re not a Catholic or Christian.

        Or are you?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Yes, I live in Rio, Brazil.
        And no, I am not Catholic or Christian, I am an atheist who would love to believe in God.
        People around here are what I like to call “pseudo-Christians”; people like my wife, who knows nothing about the Bible, who has all kinds of pagan superstitions and who feels she does enough by conjuring a split-second sign of the cross in front of her breast before going to bed.

        Liked by 1 person

      • I don’t know I’m how much time you have before this conference, but maybe, at least for future ideas and just expanding your knowledge base; since it seems that you are interested in objects and subjects. Maybe go on your database or Google it won’t be hard to find: Graham Harman , that I’ve already mentioned. I think through his wiki page down at the bottom there is a link to a website that has all of his papers that he’s written over the years downloadable PDF’s.

        But if you don’t want to sift through all that; I think a very good essay that he wrote I don’t know 15 years ago maybe. That kind of gives one a good impression of what his philosophy is about: on vicarious causation.

        Maybe you might enjoy it and get something out of it.

        Maybe it’ll be enough just to get out of the rut of your head for a minute.

        I hope you feel better.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Thanks. Ever since you told me about Graham Harman, I have been willing to read about him. But, yeah, the conference is closing in on me and the problem is that I have FIVE tests next week and work and the baby girl and a thousand stressful problems and …. so it’s going to be hard to read him just now. But I’ve just this second downloaded “vicarious” and, although it seems to be a “little” over my head, I promise I’ll take a look as soon as I can. Thanks for your wishes!

        Liked by 1 person

      • So far is your life commitments: Si Se Puede. Even though you probably speak Portuguese and not Spanish? And I am very proud of you, even though I don’t know you.

        And as for whether that essay is over your head: we all got to start somewhere.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Hahaha I was enjoying him, but he got too religious. Not class, the WHOLE conference is about him! They said I could write about pretty much any theme, but it doesn’t make sense to me to do so. I want to try to write about him. But I might be “forcing the bar”, like we say it down here…

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s